4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Controlled bandgap CuIn1-xGax(S0.1Se0.9)2 (0.10 ≤ x ≤ 0.72) solar cells from electrodeposited precursors

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 582, Issue -, Pages 2-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.068

Keywords

Electrodeposition; CIGS; Gallium segregation; Annealing; Photovoltaics; Ionic liquids; Deep eutectic solvent

Funding

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche du Luxembourg [1080203, C11/MS/1211521, 07/06]
  2. European project [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN 316488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrodeposition and post-annealing is a potentially low-cost industrial growth route for Cu(In, Ga)(S, Se)(2) solar cells. Nevertheless, this process is limited by the difficulty to introduce gallium in the precursor and by the segregation of gallium during the annealing step. Previously, we countered the former problem by co-electrodepositing In and Ga from a Deep Eutectic Solvent, accurately controlling the Ga/(Ga + In) (referred to as Ga/III) ratio of the precursor. In order to avoid segregation we employed a three-step annealing procedure, introducing a limited quantity of sulphur on the surface of the absorber. In this work, absorbers and solar cells originating from electrodeposited precursors with 0.10 <= Ga/III <= 0.72 are characterised. X-ray diffraction results show that the Cu(In, Ga)Se-2 112 peak shifts to higher angles with increasing Ga content, in agreement with the expected composition values. Additionally, these results show identical incorporation of sulphur in all samples. Photoluminescence, external quantum efficiency, and current-voltage measurements corroborate the X-ray diffraction results. Controlled incorporation of Ga, over a large Ga/III range, is achieved for electrodeposited and post-annealed Cu(In, Ga)(S, Se)(2) absorbers. A maximum solar cell efficiency of 9.8% was obtained. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available