4.5 Article

Kinetic study of the dehydration reaction of lithium sulfate monohydrate crystals using microscopy and modeling

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 621, Issue -, Pages 44-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.10.005

Keywords

Nucleation and growth; Kinetic models; Microscopic measurement; Thermo-chemical heat storage; Dehydration reaction

Funding

  1. Advanced Dutch Energy Material (ADEM)
  2. Energy research Center of the Netherlands (ECN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulation of gas-solid reactions occurring in industrial processes requires a robust kinetic model to be applicable in a wide range of complicated reaction conditions. However, in literature it is often seen that even the same reaction under specific controlled conditions is interpreted with different kinetic models. In the present work, a phenomenological model based on nucleation and nuclei growth processes is presented to study the kinetics of the dehydration reaction of lithium sulfate monohydrate single crystals. The two elementary processes of the reaction, nucleation and nuclei growth, are characterized and quantified as a function of temperature by using optical microscopy experiments. The in-situ measured characteristics of the dehydration reaction provided confirmatory evidence that the rate of nucleation obeys an exponential law and the rate of nuclei growth is approximately constant. With knowledge acquired from the optical observations as inputs of the kinetic model, the fractional conversion of the dehydration reaction was calculated and compared with experimental results from thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). A satisfactory comparison was found both in isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. It is demonstrated that this knowledge-based model has a great potential to represent the gas-solid reaction kinetics in a wide range of process conditions regarding temperature, pressure and particle geometry. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available