4.6 Article

Effect of irregularities of nanosatellites position and size on collective electric and magnetic plasmonic resonances in spherical nanoclusters

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 7667-7685

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.007667

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission [228762]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF)-CMMI [1101074]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1101074] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spherical nanoclusters (NCs) with a central dielectric core surrounded by several satellite plasmonic nanospheres have been recently investigated as aggregates supporting electric and magnetic collective resonances. Notably, the collective magnetic resonance has been exploited to provide magnetic properties in optics, i.e., materials with macroscopic relative permeability different from unity. The NCs discussed in this paper can be realized using state-of-the-art nanochemistry self-assembly techniques. Accordingly, perfectly regular disposition of the nanoplasmonic satellites is not possible and this paper constitutes the first comprehensive analysis of the effect of such irregularities onto the electric and magnetic collective resonances. In particular we will show that the peak of the scattering cross section associated to the magnetic resonance is very sensitive to certain irregularities and significantly less to others. It is shown here that artificial magnetic properties of NCs are preserved for certain degrees of irregularities of the nanosatellites positions, however they are strongly affected by irregularities in the plasmonic nanosatellites sizes and by the presence of defects caused by the absence of satellites in the process of self-assembly around the dielectric core. The artificial electric resonance is instead less affected by irregularities mainly because of its wider frequency bandwidth. (C) 2013 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available