4.6 Article

Sustained Delivery Fluocinolone Acetonide Vitreous Implants Long-Term Benefit in Patients with Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 10, Pages 1892-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.019

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Alimera Sciences
  2. Allergan
  3. Aerpio Therapeutics
  4. Genzyme
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Oxford Biomedica
  7. Genentech
  8. Novartis
  9. Bayer Healthcare
  10. GSK
  11. Alcon
  12. Optos
  13. Heidelberg Engineering
  14. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  15. Pfizer
  16. Alimera Sciences, Inc
  17. Alpharetta
  18. Georgia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To present the safety and efficacy of intravitreal implants releasing 0.2 mg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) in patients with chronic versus nonchronic diabetic macular edema (DME). To assess ocular characteristics, anatomic changes, and re-treatment and ancillary therapies that may explain the differential treatment effect seen with intravitreal implants releasing FAc 0.2 mg/day in patients with chronic and nonchronic DME. An overall benefit-to- risk assessment for the FAc 0.2-mg/day and FAc 0.5-mg/day doses has been reported previously. Design: Preplanned subgroup analysis of chronic (duration of diagnosis, >= 3 years) and nonchronic (duration of diagnosis, < 3 years) DME in patients from 2 randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trials. Participants: Patients with persistent DME despite 1 or more macular laser treatment were randomized 1: 2: 2 to sham injection (n = 185), FAc 0.2 mg/day (n = 375), or FAc 0.5 mg/day (n = 393). Methods: Patients received study drug or sham injection and after 6 weeks were eligible for rescue laser. Based on re-treatment criteria, additional masked study drug could be given after 1 year. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of patients with improvement of 15 letters or more from baseline. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and foveal thickness. Results: At month 36, the difference between FAc 0.2 mg/day and sham control in the percentage of patients who gained 15 letters or more was significantly greater in chronic DME patients (FAc 0.2 mg/day, 34.0% vs. sham, 13.4%; P < 0.001), compared with patients with nonchronic DME (FAc 0.2 mg/day, 22.3% vs. sham, 27.8%; P = 0.275). The greater response in patients with chronic DME was not associated with baseline ocular characteristics, changes in anatomic features, or differences in re-treatment or ancillary therapies. The ocular adverse event profile for FAc 0.2 mg/day was similar regardless of DME duration. Conclusions: This is the first published analysis correlating duration of diagnosis of DME with treatment effect. In patients with chronic DME, FAc 0.2 mg/day provides substantial visual benefit for up to 3 years and would provide an option for patients who do not respond to other therapy. (C) 2014 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available