4.4 Article

Association between Phosphorylated AMP-Activated Protein Kinase and MAPK3/1 Expression and Prognosis for Patients with Gastric Cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 78-85

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000351234

Keywords

AMPK; Gastric cancer; MAPK3/1; Prognostic markers; Resection

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government [2012-0005226]
  3. Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A111345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (pAMPK) plays a central role in cellular metabolic sensing and energy balance homeostasis, and interacts with various pathways [e.g., TP53, mTOR, NUAK2 (sucrose nonfermenting-like kinase), MAPK3/1 (ERK) and PDK]. Therefore, the present study analyzed the expression of pAMPK, NUAK2, MAPK3/1 and PDK-1 and their effect on the survival of patients with resected gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 621 patients with gastric adenocarcinonna surgically resected with curative intent were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemical staining for pAMPK, NUAK2, MAPK3/1 and PDK-1 was performed using tissue nnicroarrays of surgical specimens of gastric cancer tissue. Results: Positive pAMPK, NUAK2, MAPK3/1 and PDK-1 expression was observed in 379 (61.0%), 257 (41.4%), 327 (52.7%) and 67 (10.8%) cases, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis showed a significantly better survival for the patients with positive pAMPK or MAPK3/1 expression than for the patients with a negative expression [pAMPK: disease-free survival (DFS), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.750, 95% confidence interval (Cl) = 0.568-0.970, p = 0.030; MAPK3/1: DFS, HR = 0.692, 95% Cl = 0.720-0.974, p = 0.021), while NUAK2 or PDK-1 expression had no effect on survival. Conclusion: pAMPK or MAPK3/1 expression was found to be an independent prognostic marker for patients with resected gastric cancer. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available