4.4 Article

Thrombocytopenia in Relation to Tumor Size in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages 339-345

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000342431

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Diameter; Thrombocytopenia; Portal vein thrombosis; alpha-Fetoprotein; gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) size at diagnosis is important in management. Without screening programs, tumor size at diagnosis is heterogeneous. Aims: To examine the clinical parameters related to tumor size. Methods: Using prospectively collected data from a 1,100-patient biopsy-proven HCC cohort presenting in the absence of screening, tumor sizes were ordered and trichotomized and the resulting terciles were compared for tumor and blood parameters. Results:The terciles were significantly different with respect to portal hypertension and thrombocytopenia, which were present in a higher percent of tercile I patients with smaller tumors. Tercile III patients with larger HCCs had the highest serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP), and alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) levels and the most portal vein (PV) thrombosis. Subclassification of tercile I patients by AFP showed that patients with high serum AFP had increased numbers of tumor nodules, more PV thrombosis, higher bilirubin, ALKP, and GGTP levels, and shorter survival. Conclusions: Smaller-tumor tercile I patients had more advanced portal hypertension with thrombocytopenia than did larger-tumor patients. Tercile I patients with higher AFP levels had more frequent PV thrombosis and worse survival than those with lower AFP levels. Elevated serum GGTP and ALKP levels appear to be associated with a more aggressive HCC phenotype. These differing patterns suggest more than one HCC pathway. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available