Journal
ONCOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 87-93Publisher
KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000306137
Keywords
Cancer of unknown primary; Life expectancy estimation; Positive predictive value; Prognostic score
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: To implement 3 published prognostic scores in an independent set of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP), and compare their performance on individual life expectancy prediction. Patients and Method: The survival of 430 consecutive patients with CUP was measured after they had allocated to their prognostic group (good prognosis vs. poor prognosis) according to each prognostic score. Using a 2 x 2 contingency table, we measured the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy of each score in predicting individual outcome (survival <90 days or >180 days). Results: The median overall survival was 189 days (1-4,801 days). Survival was <90 days in 143/421 cases and >180 days in 208/413 cases. The three PPVs were within the same range for prediction of survival <90 days (from 43 to 49%) as well as for prediction of survival >180 days (from 70 to 80%), and underestimate individual life expectancy of 40-50% of the patients. None of the 3 scores appeared significantly better. Conclusion: The main finding of this retrospective analysis is that the published prognostic scores cannot be used for rational decision making. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available