4.8 Article

A chemical biology approach identifies AMPK as a modulator of melanoma oncogene MITF

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 33, Issue 19, Pages 2531-2539

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.185

Keywords

MITF; melanoma; AMPK; compound C; midostaurin; sunitinib

Funding

  1. FWF-Austrian Science Fund [L590-B12]
  2. Austrian Academy of Sciences
  3. GEN-AU initiative of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science and Research (PLACEBO GZ) [BMWF-70.081/0018-II/1a/2008, APP-III 820965]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 24321, L 590] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [L590] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is indispensable for the viability of melanocytic cells, is an oncogene in melanoma and has a cell type-specific expression pattern. As the modulation of MITF activity by direct chemical targeting remains a challenge, we assessed a panel of drugs for their ability to downregulate MITF expression or activity by targeting its upstream modulators. We found that the multi-kinase inhibitors midostaurin and sunitinib downregulate MITF protein levels. To identify the target molecules shared by both the drugs in melanocytic cells, a chemical proteomic approach was applied and AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) was identified as the relevant target for the observed phenotype. RNA interference and chemical inhibition of AMPK led to a decrease in MITF protein levels. Reduction of MITF protein levels was the result of proteasomal degradation, which was preceded by enhanced phosphorylation of MITF mediated by ERK. As expected, downregulation of MITF protein levels by AMPK inhibition was associated with decreased viability. Together, these results identify AMPK as an important regulator for the maintenance of MITF protein levels in melanocytic cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available