4.8 Article

Homeodomain protein DLX4 counteracts key transcriptional control mechanisms of the TGF-β cytostatic program and blocks the antiproliferative effect of TGF-β

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 30, Issue 24, Pages 2718-2729

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.4

Keywords

cell growth; homeobox genes; Smad; Sp1; TGF-beta

Funding

  1. Schissler Foundation
  2. Vietnam Education Foundation
  3. US Department of Defense [W81XWH-06-1-0259]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA141078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The antiproliferative activity of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is essential for maintaining normal tissue homeostasis and is lost in many types of tumors. Gene responses that are central to the TGF-beta cytostatic program include activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p15(Ink4B) and p21(WAF1/Cip1), and repression of c-myc. These gene responses are tightly regulated by a repertoire of transcription factors that include Smad proteins and Sp1. The DLX4 homeobox patterning gene encodes a transcription factor that is absent from most normal adult tissues, but is expressed in a wide variety of malignancies, including lung, breast, prostate and ovarian cancers. In this study, we demonstrate that DLX4 blocks the antiproliferative effect of TGF-b. DLX4 inhibited TGF-beta-mediated induction of p15(Ink4B) and p21(WAF1/Cip1) expression. DLX4 bound and prevented Smad4 from forming complexes with Smad2 and Smad3, but not with Sp1. However, DLX4 also bound and inhibited DNA-binding activity of Sp1. In addition, DLX4 induced expression of c-myc independently of TGF-beta/Smad signaling. The ability of DLX4 to counteract key transcriptional control mechanisms of the TGF-beta cytostatic program could explain, in part, the resistance of tumors to the antiproliferative effect of TGF-beta Oncogene (2011) 30, 2718-2729; doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.4; published online 7 February 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available