4.8 Article

Flanking sequence specificity determines coding microsatellite heteroduplex and mutation rates with defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR)

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 29, Issue 15, Pages 2172-2180

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.508

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States Public Health Service [DK067287]
  2. UCSD Digestive Diseases Research Development Center [DK080506]
  3. VA Research Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activin type II receptor (ACVR2) contains two identical microsatellites in exons 3 and 10, but only the exon 10 microsatellite is frameshifted in mismatch repair (MMR)-defective colonic tumors. The reason for this selectivity is not known. We hypothesized that ACVR2 frameshifts were influenced by DNA sequences surrounding the microsatellite. We constructed plasmids in which exons 3 or 10 of ACVR2 were cloned vertical bar 1 bp out of frame of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), allowing -1 bp frameshift to express EGFP. Plasmids were stably transfected into MMR-deficient cells, and subsequent non-fluorescent cells were sorted, cultured and harvested for mutation analysis. We swapped DNA sequences flanking the exon 3 and 10 microsatellites to test our hypothesis. Native ACVR2 exon 3 and 10 microsatellites underwent heteroduplex formation (A7/T8) in hMLH1(-/-) cells, but only exon 10 microsatellites fully mutated (A7/T7) in both hMLH1(-/-) and hMSH6(-/-) backgrounds, showing selectivity for exon 10 frameshifts and inability of exon 3 heteroduplexes to fully mutate. Substituting nucleotides flanking the exon 3 microsatellite for nucleotides flanking the exon 10 microsatellite significantly reduced heteroduplex and full mutation in hMLH1(-/-) cells. When the exon 3 microsatellite was flanked by nucleotides normally surrounding the exon 10 microsatellite, fully mutant exon 3 frameshifts appeared. Mutation selectivity for ACVR2 lies partly with flanking nucleotides surrounding each microsatellite. Oncogene (2010) 29, 2172-2180; doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.508; published online 8 February 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available