4.8 Article

Difference between genomic actions of estrogen versus raloxifene in human ovarian cancer cell lines

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages 2737-2745

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210926

Keywords

ovarian cancer; estrogen; raloxifene; SRC-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although there is growing evidence that estrogens promote tumor progression in epithelial ovarian cancer, the molecular mechanisms accounting for this are still unclear. Selective estrogen receptor modulators ( SERMs) mimic estrogen action in certain tissues while opposing it in others. The molecular mechanisms of the effects of SERMs such as raloxifene on the tumor progression of epithelial ovarian cancer are also still unclear. Here, we show that various genomic actions of estrogen differ from those of raloxifene in human ovarian cancer cell lines expressing estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha). 17 beta-Estradiol (E2) induced the gene expression of c-Myc and IGF-1 and increased the binding of ER alpha to the AP1 site of the promoters of c-Myc and IGF-1. ER alpha silencing abolished the E2-stimulated c-Myc expression. E2 induced the recruitment of co-activators such as SRC-1, SRC-3 and CBP to the promoters of c-Myc and IGF-1, and SRC-1 silencing abolished both the E2-stimulated c-Myc expression and cell-cycle progression. In contrast, although raloxifene increased the binding of ER alpha to the AP1 site of the promoters of c-Myc and IGF-1, raloxifene had no effect on the gene expression of c-Myc or IGF-1. Raloxifene induced the recruitment of co-repressors such as HDAC2, N-CoR and SMRT to the promoter of IGF-1. Thus, the difference between the genomic actions exerted by estrogen and raloxifene in human ovarian cancer cell lines expressing ERa appear to be dependent on the recruitment of co-regulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available