4.5 Article

Universal scaling of species-abundance distributions across multiple scales

Journal

OIKOS
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages 1101-1111

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20751.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F043112/1]
  2. NERC [NE/I021179]
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-0640386, DEB-0425651, DEB-0346488, DEB-0129874, DEB-00753102, DEB-9909347, DEB-9615226, DEB-9405933, DEB-9221033, DEB-9100058, DEB-8906869, DEB-8605042, DEB-8206992, DEB-7922197]
  4. Center for Tropical Forest Science
  5. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
  6. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  7. Mellon Foundation
  8. Small World Institute Fund
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F043112/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I021179/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. EPSRC [EP/F043112/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. NERC [NE/I021179/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scale-dependent species abundance distribution (SAD) is fundamental in ecology, but few spatially explicit models of this pattern have thus far been studied. Here we show spatially explicit neutral model predictions for SADs over a wide range of spatial scales, which appear to match empirical patterns qualitatively. We find that the assumption of a log-series SAD in the metacommunity made by spatially implicit neutral models can be justified with a spatially explicit model in the large area limit. Furthermore, our model predicts that SADs on multiple scales are characterized by a single, compound parameter that represents the ratio of the survey area to the species' average biogeographic range (which is in turn set by the speciation rate and the dispersal distance). This intriguing prediction is in line with recent empirical evidence for a universal scaling of the species-area curve. Hence we hypothesize that empirical SAD patterns will show a similar universal scaling for many different taxa and across multiple spatial scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available