4.5 Article

Light interception in species with different functional groups coexisting in moorland plant communities

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 164, Issue 3, Pages 591-599

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1674-5

Keywords

Canopy structure; Leaf angle; Life form; Light partitioning; Biomass allocation

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS
  2. KAKENHI
  3. Global Environment Research Fund [F-052, F-092]
  4. Ministry of the Environment, Japan
  5. MEXT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Competition for light is one of the most essential mechanisms affecting species composition. It has been suggested that similar light acquisition efficiency (I broken vertical bar(mass), absorbed photon flux per unit aboveground mass) may contribute to species coexistence in multi-species communities. On the other hand, it is known that traits related with light acquisition vary among functional groups. We studied whether I broken vertical bar(mass) was similar among species with different functional groups coexisting in moorland communities. We conducted stratified clipping in midsummer when the stand biomass reached a maximum. Light partitioning among species was estimated using a model accounting for both direct and diffuse light. Evergreen species were found to have a significantly lower I broken vertical bar(mass) than deciduous species, which resulted from their lower absorbed photon flux per unit leaf area and lower specific leaf area. Shrubs had a smaller leaf mass fraction, but their I broken vertical bar(mass) was not lower than that of herbs because they had a higher leaf position due to the presence of wintering stems. Species with vertical leaves had a higher I broken vertical bar(mass) than those with horizontal leaves despite vertical leaves being a decided disadvantage in terms of light absorption. This higher I broken vertical bar(mass) was achieved by a greater leaf height in species with vertical leaves. Our results clearly demonstrate that light acquisition efficiency was different among the functional groups. However, the trend observed is not necessarily the same as that expected based on prior knowledge, suggesting that disadvantages in some traits for light acquisition efficiency are partly compensated for by other traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available