4.3 Article

Geochemical and acoustic evidence for the occurrence of methane in sediments of the Polish sector of the southern Baltic Sea

Journal

OCEANOLOGIA
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 951-978

Publisher

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES INST OCEANOLOGY
DOI: 10.5697/oc.55-4.951

Keywords

Methane; Sediments; Southern Baltic; Gas bubbles; SMTZ

Categories

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N306 441638]
  2. BONUS project 'BALTIC GAS
  3. National Science Centre [DEC-2011/03/N/ST10/05633]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results of geochemical and acoustic investigations of sediments in the Polish sector of the southern Baltic Sea. Its objective was to indicate areas of gas bubble formation and the occurrence of methane. Over 3000 nautical miles of transects were recorded using a variety of hydroacoustic instruments, and five coring points were selected for further analyses of pore waters (CH4, SO42-, H2S, NH4+, total alkalinity) and sediments (grain size distribution, C-org, N-tot, LOT and WC). Gas turned out to be present at shallow depths in different forms such as recent and buried pockmarks, and gas-saturated sediments (including gas pockets and seepages). It was found that methane was widespread in the sediments of the study area, both in the surface sediments, e.g. in the vicinity of the Hel Peninsula or in the central Gulf of Gdansk, and in deeper sediment layers, e.g. in the Gdansk Deep and the Slupsk Furrow. Chemical analysis showed that as a result of the rapid decomposition of organic matter, sulphates were depleted in the top 20 cm layer of sediments and that methane was produced at relatively shallow depths (in some areas even at depths of 20-30 cm bsf) compared to other regions of the Baltic, reaching concentrations of > 6 mmol 1(-1) in the 30-40 cm layer below the sediment surface. The sulphate-methane transition zone (SMTZ) was 4-37 cm thick and was situated in the uppermost 50 cm of the sediments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available