4.5 Article

Impact of active faulting on the post LGM infill of Le Bourget Lake (western Alps, France)

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 664, Issue -, Pages 31-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.024

Keywords

Alps; Jura; Riedel model; Active tectonic; Lake Le Bourget; Seismic imaging

Funding

  1. Assemblee des Pays de Savoie
  2. BERSSIN/IRSN
  3. Labex OSUG (Investissements d'avenir) [ANR10 LABX56]
  4. ISTerre laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have used high resolution seismic imaging to detect and characterize the recent deformation recorded by the Quaternary sediments of Le Bourget Lake. The last glacial episodes (MIS 6a and 2, i.e., Riss and Wiirm) scoured out an elongated over-deepened basin to more than 300 m below the present lake level and the basin accumulated 150 m of post-LGM to Holocene sediments. The well-stratified character of the infill is locally disturbed by tectonic deformations and gravity reworking. A northern fault zone, in continuation with the left-lateral strike slip Culoz Fault, is imaged within the Holocene and Late Glacial accumulations. A southern fault zone is also detected, which can be related to the sub-lacustrine continuation of a much smaller fault affecting the Jura alpine foreland: the Col du Chat left lateral strike slip fault. Different generations of fractures have been identified in the lake, allowing correlation and mapping. In pre-Quaternary substratum, the Culoz Fault has a N 160 degrees orientation. Within the post-LGM sediments, fractures related to the Culoz Fault have an orientation between N135 degrees and 95 degrees. A Cloos model (1932) is thus proposed to explain the observed pattern of lacustrine deformations. The calculated horizontal slip rate for Culoz Fault during Holocene is about 13 mm. yr(-1), and for the Col du Chat Fault is around 0.6 mm.yr(-1). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available