4.5 Article

The Metallogenetic Regularities of Lithium Deposits in China

Journal

ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA-ENGLISH EDITION
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 652-670

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.12453

Keywords

lithium deposit; prediction type of lithium resources; metallogenetic regularity; metallogenic series; pegmatite

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41372088]
  2. China Geological Survey Program [1212011220805, 1212011121037, 12120114039601, 1212011220369]
  3. Chinese National Non-profit Institute Research Grant of CAGS-IMR [K1409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium resources support the development of high-technology industries. China has abundant lithium resources which are mainly distributed in Tibet, Qinghai, Sichuan and Jiangxi. Salt lakes in China have significant lithium reserves, but lithium is mainly produced from hard rock lithium deposits because the extraction from salt lakes requires further improvements. The hard rock lithium deposits mainly occur in granitic pegmatite in the Altay region of Xinjiang and the Jiajika deposit in western Sichuan Province; they mainly formed in the Mesozoic and occurred in a relatively stable stage during orogenic processes. On the basis of the information from 151 lithium deposits or spots, 14 lithium metallogenic series were identified, and granitic pegmatite, granite, and sedimentary types were considered to be the main prediction types of lithium resources. Twelve lithium mineralization belts were divided and a series of maps showing the lithium metallogenetic regularity in China were drawn. We conclude that the hard rock and brine type of lithium resources possibly have a similar lithium source related to magmatism. The metallogenic features of the lithium in China were related with the distinct history of tectonic-magmatic activity in China. This study benefits the assessment of, and prospecting for, lithium resources in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available