4.6 Article

The Effect of Childbirth on Hiatal Dimensions

Journal

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages 1272-1278

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a5ef23

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Betty Byrne Henderson Foundation, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To estimate changes in levator hiatal dimensions after childbirth in women with and without ultrasonographically visible morphological abnormalities of the levator ani and to correlate those changes with delivery mode. METHODS: A total of 296 nulliparous women were recruited. They were examined with four-dimensional translabial ultrasonography at 36-38 weeks of gestation and at 3-4 months postpartum. Peripartal changes in levator hiatal dimensions were correlated with delivery data. RESULTS: Mean postpartum follow-up was 5.3 months (median 4.1, interquartile range 3.7 to 5.1). Of 212 women who returned for follow-up, 101 had had normal vaginal deliveries (48%), 31 vacuum/forceps (15%), and 80 cesarean deliveries (38%). After cesarean delivery, there was a decrease in the mean hiatal area on Valsalva maneuver of 8.5% (P=.005). Vaginal delivery without avulsion was associated with an increase of 6% (P=.035). In women with avulsion injury, hiatal area increased by 28% (P=.002). Mean postpartum hiatal area on Valsalva was 25.46 cm(2) after vaginal delivery with avulsion, 22.61 cm 2 without avulsion, and 19.13 cm(2) in the cesarean delivery group. After avulsion, hiatal area on contraction also increased significantly (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Vaginal childbirth results in enlargement of the levator hiatus, especially after an avulsion. However, even without macroscopic levator trauma, there may be increased distensibility of the hiatus, which may be another mechanism leading to enlargement of the hiatus and pelvic organ prolapse. (Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1272-8)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available