4.4 Article

Weight Loss Expectations of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Candidates Compared to Clinically Expected Weight Loss Outcomes 1-Year Post-surgery

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 1987-1993

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1007-y

Keywords

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Weight loss expectations; Goals and Relative Weights Questionnaire; Obesity; Newfoundland and Labrador

Categories

Funding

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland
  2. Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) results in significant, sustainable weight loss in obese individuals (body mass index (BMI) a parts per thousand yen40 kg/m(2) or BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2) with major comorbidity). Average clinically expected % excess weight loss (%EWL) has been reported to be 56.1 % 1 year after LSG. Unrealistic weight loss expectations are purported to negatively impact treatment adherence and weight loss outcomes. This study examined the weight loss expectations of LSG candidates in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The Goals and Relative Weights Questionnaire was administered before the start of a bariatric surgery education session to 84 consecutive LSG candidates. Patients reported postoperative weight loss expectations in four categories: dream, happy, acceptable, and disappointed. Participants included 69 women and 15 men with an average age and weight of 43.7 years and 136.7 kg. The patients reported average postoperative dream and happy weights as 71.1 and 80.0 kg, respectively. Patients reported a weight of 86.2 kg as acceptable but would be disappointed with a weight of 105.6 kg. To achieve the desired amount of weight loss for each category, patients would have to achieve %EWLs of 88.7, 76.4, 68.2, and 40.6 %, respectively. Patients have higher weight loss expectations than those that are clinically expected within 1 year after LSG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available