4.7 Article

Positive Interaction Between Prebiotics and Thiazolidinedione Treatment on Adiposity in Diet-Induced Obese Mice

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 1653-1661

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20733

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SFD (Societe Francophone du Diabete)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports
  3. ERC (ENIGMO)
  4. FNRS [1.5121.12]
  5. ANR grant mirBAT
  6. European Collaborative Project DIABAT [HEALTH-F2-2011-278373]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To investigate whether inulin-type fructan (ITF) prebiotics could counteract the thiazolidinedione (TZD, PPAR gamma activator) induced-fat mass gain, without affecting its beneficial effect on glucose homeostasis, in high-fat (HF) diet fed mice. Methods: Male C57bl6/J mice were fed a HF diet alone or supplemented with ITF prebiotics (0.2 g/day X mouse) or TZD (30 mg pioglitazone (PIO)/kg body weight X day) or both during 4 weeks. An insulin tolerance test was performed after 3 weeks of treatment. Results: As expected, PIO improved glucose homeostasis and increased adiponectinaemia. Furthermore, it induced an over-expression of several PPAR gamma target genes in white adipose tissues. ITF prebiotics modulated the PIO-induced PPAR gamma activation in a tissue-dependent manner. The co-treatment with ITF prebiotics and PIO maintained the beneficial impact of TZD on glucose homeostasis and adiponectinaemia. Moreover, the combination of both treatments reduced fat mass accumulation, circulating lipids and hepatic triglyceride content, suggesting an overall improvement of metabolism. Finally, the co-treatment favored induction of white-to-brown fat conversion in subcutaneous adipose tissue, thereby leading to the development of brite adipocytes that could increase the oxidative capacity of the tissue. Conclusions: ITF prebiotics decrease adiposity and improve the metabolic response in HF fed mice treated with TZD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available