4.7 Article

Dose-Dependent Suppression of Hunger by a Specific Alginate in a Low-Viscosity Drink Formulation

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1171-1176

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.63

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Unilever RD Vlaardingen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Addition of specific types of alginates to drinks can enhance postmeal suppression of hunger, by forming strong gastric gels in the presence of calcium. However, some recent studies have not demonstrated an effect of alginate/calcium on appetite, perhaps because the selected alginates do not produce sufficiently strong gels or because the alginates were not sufficiently hydrated when consumed. Therefore, the objective of the study was to test effects on appetite of a strongly gelling and fully hydrated alginate in an acceptable, low-viscosity drink formulation. In a balanced order crossover design, 23 volunteers consumed a meal replacement drink containing protein and calcium and either 0 (control), 0.6, or 0.8% of a specific high-guluronate alginate. Appetite (six self-report scales) was measured for 5 h postconsumption. Relevant physicochemical properties of the drinks were measured, i.e., product viscosity and strength of gel formed under simulated gastric conditions. Hunger was robustly reduced (20-30% lower area under the curve) with 0.8% alginate (P < 0.001, analysis of covariance), an effect consistent across all appetite scales. Most effects were also significant with 0.6% alginate, and a clear dose-response observed. Gastric gel strength was 1.8 and 3.8 N for the 0.6 and 0.8% alginate drinks, respectively, while product viscosity was acceptable (< 0.5 Pa.s at 10 s(-1)). We conclude that strongly gastric-gelling alginates at relatively low concentrations in a low-viscosity drink formulation produced a robust reduction in hunger responses. This and other related studies indicate that the specific alginate source and product matrix critically impacts upon apparent efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available