4.7 Article

Effect of a cellulose-containing weight-loss supplement on gastric emptying and sensory functions

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 2272-2280

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.355

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for Clinical Research, Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Rotenburg an der Fulda, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CM3, a highly cross-linked cellulose in capsule form, expands in the stomach to a size several fold of its original volume. It is purported to induce a prolonged feeling of satiation and a delay in gastric emptying, thus promoting weight loss. We examined whether CM3 delays gastric emptying (using the stable isotope C-13-octanoic breath test) and whether it influences subjective feelings of appetite sensations (using visual analog scales, VASs). We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial in 19 moderately obese but otherwise healthy subjects (mean age 55 +/- 9 years, BMI 31.1 +/- 4.6 kg/m(2)). The subjects were treated with six capsules of CM3 or matching placebo 30 min before a standardized solid meal. Breath collection and VASs were performed over 4 h every 15 min and 30 min, respectively. Half-excretion time of (CO2)-C-13 in breath, indicating gastric emptying half time, was the primary outcome parameter. The study was powered to detect a change in gastric emptying of 20-30 min. Mean (CO2)-C-13 half-excretion time changed from 2.3 +/- 0.4 to 2.4 +/- 0.33 h (mean difference +6 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3 to +15 min; P = 0.17). Appetite sensations (hunger, satiation, fullness, prospective food consumption, desire to eat something sweet, salty, savory, or fatty) changed over time during the course of the postprandial phase but were not influenced by CM3 (repeated measures ANOVA). In obese subjects, acute administration of the weight-loss supplement CM3 does not delay gastric emptying and does not influence subjective appetite sensations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available