4.5 Article

Relative and biomarker-based validity of a food frequency questionnaire that measures the intakes of vitamin B-12, folate, iron, and zinc in young women

Journal

NUTRITION RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 14-20

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2010.12.004

Keywords

Validation; FFQ; Biomarker; Women; Vitamin B-12; Folate; Iron; Zinc

Funding

  1. Meat & Livestock Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Folate, vitamin B-12, iron, and zinc are particularly important nutrients for women of childbearing age. We tested the hypothesis that an electronic, 235-item, semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is a valid measure of dietary intake when compared with repeat dietary 24-hour recalls. Biomarkers of folate, vitamin Bp, iron, and zinc were determined because their measurement errors are unrelated to errors in dietary questionnaires. Female adults (N = 256) aged 18 to 35 years completed the FFQ, and a representative subset (n = 53) completed repeat dietary 24-hour recalls. The FFQ estimates (mean +/- SD) were 315 +/- 132 mu g for folate, 3.1 +/- 2.1 mu g for vitamin B-12, 15.4 +/- 5.6 mg for iron, and 15.1 +/- 6.4 mg for zinc. The percentage of women classified within the same +/- 1 quartile for energy intake by the 2 methods was 77.3%. There was moderate agreement between the 2 dietary methods, and no systematic bias was noted for energy, folate, vitamin B-12, and zinc. The deattenuated energy-adjusted correlation coefficients ranged from 0.41 (dietary folate equivalents) to 0.60 (folate). Significant correlations between biomarker and nutrient intakes were found for folate (r = 0.37, P < .01) and vitamin B-12 (r = 0.27, P < .01). The electronic FFQ developed in the present study is a relatively valid tool that was able to adequately assess and rank individuals according to their nutrient intakes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. Al! rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available