4.5 Article

Microvascular disorders in obese Zucker rats are restored by a rice bran diet

Journal

NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 524-531

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.10.032

Keywords

Rice bran; Mesenteric artery; Obese Zucker rat; Microvascular function; Obesity

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2009-1159]
  2. FPU Fellowship from the Spanish Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aim: Nutritional-based approaches aimed to prevent microvascular dysfunction associated to obesity present potential advantages over pharmacological strategies. Our aim was to test whether a rice bran enzymatic extract (RBEE)-supplemented diet could attenuate microvascular alterations in obese rats. Methods and results: Lean and obese Zucker rats were fed standard diet supplemented or not with 1% and 5% RBEE for 20 weeks. Functional studies were performed in small mesenteric arteries in isometric myograph. Immunoblotting and fluorescence studies were made in arterial homogenates and arterial sections, respectively. RBEE-supplementation restored microvascular function in obese rats through a marked increase in NO and endothelial-derived hyperpolarizing factor contribution by up-regulation of eNOS and calcium-activated potassium channels expression, respectively, in association to a substantial reduction of microvascular inflammation and superoxide anion formation. These data agrees with the beneficial actions of RBEE on dyslipidemia, hyperinsulinemia and hypertension in obesity. Conclusion: The multi-factorial properties of RBEE-diet, especially for restoring the function of small resistance arteries shows this dietary-based approach to be a promising candidate for prevention of microvascular alterations in obesity, which are crucial in cardiovascular events in obese subjects. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available