4.3 Article

Effects of Vitamin E From Supplements and Diet on Colonic α- and γ-tocopherol Concentrations in Persons at Increased Colon Cancer Risk

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 73-81

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2015.965333

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 CA120381, P30 CA130810 S1]
  2. Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA046592]
  3. Clinical Translational Science Award, NIH [UL1RR024986]
  4. Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center NIH [5P60 DK20572]
  5. Michigan Nutrition and Obesity Research Center NIH [P30 DK089503]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The available evidence indicates that gamma-tocopherol has more potential for colon cancer prevention than alpha-tocopherol, but little is known about the effects of foods and supplements on tocopherol levels in human colon. This study randomized 120 subjects at increased colon cancer risk to either a Mediterranean or a Healthy Eating diet for 6 mo. Supplement use was reported by 39% of the subjects, and vitamin E intake from supplements was twofold higher than that from foods. Serum alpha-tocopherol at baseline was positively predicted by dietary intakes of synthetic vitamin E in foods and supplements but not by natural alpha-tocopherol from foods. For serum gamma-tocopherol, dietary gamma-tocopherol was not a predictor, but dietary alpha-tocopherol was a negative predictor. Unlike with serum, the data supported a role for metabolic factors, and not a direct effect of diet, in governing concentrations of both alpha- and gamma-tocopherol in colon. The Mediterranean intervention increased intakes of natural alpha-tocopherol, which is high in nuts, and decreased intakes of gamma-tocopherol, which is low in olive oil. These dietary changes had no significant effects on colon tocopherols. The impact of diet on colon tocopherols therefore appears to be limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available