Clinical significance of scintigraphic rapid gastric emptying

Objectives To analyse our results of gastric-emptying scintigraphy in relation to presenting symptoms, and examine in detail the clinical significance of rapid gastric emptying (RGE). Materials and methods Results of 642 consecutive patients who underwent a solid gastric-emptying scintigraphy in our department over an 11-year period were retrospectively reviewed with particular emphasis to the presenting symptoms and the clinical profile of patients, especially of those who showed an accelerated pattern of emptying. Results Seventy (11%) patients were clinically suspected to have a RGE and 572 (89%) patients had presumed gastroparesis. Gastric emptying was found to be normal in 290 (45%), rapid in 182 (28%) and delayed in170 (27%) patients. Normal, rapid and delayed gastric emptying were seen, respectively, in 17 (24%), 48 (69%) and five (7%) patients with the clinical suspicion of dumping and 273 (48%), 134 (23%) and 165 (29%) patients with suspected gastroparesis. The positive predictive value of clinical suspicion for RGE was 62%, whereas the positive predictive value of delayed gastric emptying was 29%. Of the 182 patients with RGE, 144 (79%) were found to have no obvious explanation for this result; reactive hypoglycaemia was present in a quarter of these patients, but diarrhoea was seen only in 3%. Conclusion Upper gastrointestinal symptoms have a poor clinical specificity to the actual rate of gastric emptying on scintigraphy. Diarrhoea as a symptom does not appear to be associated frequently with RGE, but our results confirm its relationship with hypoglycaemia. The majority of patients with a rapid emptying on gastric-emptying scintigraphy have no identifiable cause for an accelerated motility. Scintigraphic gastric-emptying studies provide a reliable and noninvasive method of investigation in patients where conventional investigations have failed to establish the cause of upper gastrointestinal dysfunction. Nucl Med Commun 32: 1185-1189 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Nuclear Medicine Communications 2011, 32: 1185-1189