4.1 Article

Performance evaluation of kinetic parameter estimation methods in dynamic FDG-PET studies

Journal

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 4-16

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32833f6c05

Keywords

2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose; linear estimation methods; nonlinear estimation methods; parameter estimation; positron emission tomography

Funding

  1. Project for the National Basic Research Program of China (973) [2011CB705700]
  2. Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT0645]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [KSCX2-YW-R-262, KGCX2-YW-129]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30873462, 60910006, 30970769, 30970771]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To evaluate several popular parameter estimation methods for determining the cerebral metabolic rate for glucose and individual kinetic rate constant parameters in 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography studies. Procedures These methods can be divided into two categories: nonlinear estimation methods and linear estimation methods. The nonlinear estimation methods include nonlinear least squares (NLLS), weighted NLLS using noisy tissue time-activity data (WNLLS-N), weighted NLLS using noise-free tissue time-activity data (WNLLS-NF), iteratively reweighted NNLS (IRWNLLS) and nonlinear ridge regression (NLRR) method, whereas the linear estimation methods include Patlak-Gjedde graphical analysis (PGA), linear least squares (LLS), generalized LLS (GLLS), total least squares (TLS) and the basis functions (BF) method. Simulation studies are presented. Results and conclusion There are several findings: (i) when the noise level is low, GLLS performs well. However, it exhibits large bias and poor precision especially in k(3)* and k(4)* when the noise level is high. (ii) BF is a promising method with superior bias and precision properties, and is less affected by the scan duration used. (iii) The weighting factors in the nonlinear estimation methods are important: a good choice of weights can help to make the estimates more accurate and reliable. Weighting based on noisy data should be avoided. (iv) It confirms that PGA is little affected by noise, but the assumptions of PGA could induce bias. It also confirms that 60 min is not long enough to give reliable estimates of k(4)* especially for the linear estimation methods LLS, TLS, and GLLS. Nucl Med Commun 32:4-16 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available