4.4 Article

Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis

Journal

SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1273-1280

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.001

Keywords

Bariatric surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy; Gastric bypass; Diabetes; Remission; Systemic review; Meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Until recently, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric surgery. In the last decade, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as a more popular, simpler, and less morbid form of bariatric surgery. Objectives: This study compares the efficacy of SG and RYGB for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Setting: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for entries up to December 2013. Search terms included Sleeve gastrectomy, Gastric bypass, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The chosen articles described both Sleeve gastrectomy and Gastric bypass and included over 1 year of follow-up data. Data analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2 and SPSS version 20. Results: The data set is comprised of 3 retrospective clinical studies, 6 prospective clinical studies, and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which involved 429 patients in the SG group and 428 patients in the RYGB group. In nonrandomized clinical studies, SG displayed similar efficacy in remission of T2D compared with the standard RYGB. In the RCTs, SG had a lower effect than that of RYGB. T2D remission was not correlated with the percent of excess weight loss for either procedure. Conclusions: Based on the current evidence, SG has a similar effect on T2D remission as RYGB. (C) 2015 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available