4.4 Article

Short-term results of single-port sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents with severe obesity

Journal

SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 65-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.029

Keywords

Obesity; Adolescents; Single port; Sleeve gastrectomy

Categories

Funding

  1. CHADO Research Project [NCT 01700738]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Dietary and lifestyle modifications, which are commonly proposed to overweight or obese youth, lack efficacy in individuals who are severely obese. Early results with bariatric procedures in obese adolescents suggest that weight loss and safety are comparable or better than seen in adults. One of these procedures, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, is commonly performed using multiple ports. Methods: We selected single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) as a minimally invasive surgery to be tested in severely obese adolescents. Prospective clinical and biochemical data were collected from 16 young severely obese patients who underwent SPSG. The setting was a university hospital. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 17.8 years (12 girls, 4 boys). The individuals' average weight was 125.5 kg and their average body mass index was 45.3 kg/m(2). All patients were insulin-resistant and 6 showed hypertriglyceridemia. The median operating time was 66 minutes, and there were no intraoperative complications. No conversion to open surgery was required. No patient required additional trocars and no patient had postoperative complications. The median hospital stay was 3 days. After a one-year follow-up, the average weight decrease was 40.3 kg, resulting in a decrease in excess weight loss by 70.61%. Insulin-resistance decreased in 16/16 patients and hypertriglyceridemia decreased in 5/6 patients. Conclusion: SPSG seems safe and effective in the short term in severely obese adolescents. (C) 2015 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available