4.3 Review

Nuclear Data Sheets for A=84

Journal

NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages 2815-+

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2009.10.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the DOE, USA [DE-AC02-06CH11357, 98CH10886]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluated spectroscopic data are presented for 12 known nuclides of mass 84 (Ga, Ge, As, Se, Br, Kr, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo). Except for the stable nuelides Sr-84 and Kr-84, extensive new data are available for all the other nuclides since the 1997 evaluation by J.K. Tuli (1997Tu02) of A=84 nuclides. Many precise Penning-trap mass measurements since AME-2003 for A=84 nuclides (2009Re03,2008Ha23,2008We10,2007Ke09,2006Ka48, 2006De36,2006Ri15) have resulted in improved Q values and separation energies. However, many deficiencies still remain. Some examples are given below. Excited-state data for Ga-84 and As-84 are nonexistent, and those for Ge-84 are scarce, The radioactive decay Schemes of Ga-84, Ge-84, Se-84, Y-84 (39.5 min), Y-84 (4.6 s), Zr-84 and Nb-84 suffer from incompleteness and that for Mo-84 decay is not known at all. The energy ordering of the two activities (39.5 min and and 4.6 8) of Y-84 is not well established, although, high-spin with tentative spin-parity of (6+) is adopted here as the ground State of Y-84 based on weak arguments. From a conference report published in 2000, it is clear that extensive experiments were done to investigate decays of Zr-84 and Y-84, but details of these studies never appeared in literature and none were made available to the evaluators when requested from original authors. This evaluation was carried out as part of ENSDF workshop for Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluators, organized and hosted by the Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania during March 30, 2009 - April 3, 2009. Names of the evaluators principally responsible for evaluation of individual nuelides are given under the respective Adopted data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available