4.5 Article

Use of a national quitline and variation in use by smoker characteristics: ITC Project New Zealand

Journal

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages S78-S84

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq111

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [06/453]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [79551]
  3. Roswell Park Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center [TTURC-P50 CA111236]
  4. U.S. National Institutes of Health
  5. NZ Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: We aimed to describe use of a national quitline service and the variation in its use by smoker characteristics (particularly ethnicity and deprivation). The setting was New Zealand (NZ), which takes proactive measures to attract disadvantaged smokers to this service. Methods: The NZ arm of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (ITC Project) utilizes the New Zealand Health Survey (a national sample) from which we surveyed adult smokers in two waves (N = 1,376 and N = 923) 1 year apart. Results: Quitline use in the last 12 months rose from 8.1% (95% CI = 6.3%-9.8%) in Wave 1 to 11.2% (95% CI = 8.4%-14.0%) at Wave 2. Maori (the indigenous people of NZ) were significantly more likely to call the Quitline than were European/other smokers. Relatively higher call rates also occurred among those reporting higher deprivation, financial stress, a past mental health disorder, a past drug-related disorder, and higher psychological distress (Kessler 10-item index). Independent associations in the multivariate analyses of Quitline use were being Maori, reporting financial stress, and ever having been diagnosed with a mental health disorder. Discussion: This national Quitline service is successfully stimulating disproportionately more calls by Maori smokers and those with some measures of disadvantage. It may therefore be contributing to reducing health inequalities. It appears possible to target quitlines to reach those smokers in greatest need.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available