4.2 Article

Estimating bird and bat fatality at wind farms: a practical overview of estimators, their assumptions and limitations

Journal

NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 63-74

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2012.758155

Keywords

wildlife; fatality estimator; search area; carcass removal; detection probability; wind power

Categories

Funding

  1. national programme of incentives for the Portuguese businesses and industry QREN (in the scope of its R&D incentive programme), under the operational programme Mais Centro
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. Fundacao Nacional para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal - FCT [PEst-OE/MAT/UI0006/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the last few years, great efforts have been made to improve the methodologies used to assess bird and bat fatalities at wind farms. For that purpose, several mortality estimators have been proposed. In general, these estimators account for: 1) partial coverage; 2) carcass removal (e.g. by scavengers or decay); and 3) imperfect detection. Perhaps surprisingly, a universal estimator that ensures good quality estimates under general circumstances is still lacking. Further, the existing estimators include different adjustment approaches and a variety of often implicit and misunderstood assumptions that may not be valid, making it difficult for practitioners to choose between them. Focusing on bird and bat fatality at onshore wind farms, we summarise and discuss implementation aspects and the assumptions involved in seven commonly used estimators. This should provide researchers requiring these methods with a basis to choose the most appropriate estimator under a given set of conditions, and contribute to increased standards in wind farm wildlife fatality estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available