- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
DTC genetic testing companies fail transparency prescriptions
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 291-307
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2011-11-01
DOI
10.1080/14636778.2011.600434
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Quantitative Analysis of Adverse Events and “Overwarning” in Drug Labeling
- (2011) Jon Duke ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Genomics in our own hands
- (2010) Ruth Williams LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Genomewide Association Studies and Assessment of the Risk of Disease
- (2010) Teri A. Manolio NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 409: Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic Testing
- (2010) OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Debating Clinical Utility
- (2010) W. Burke et al. Public Health Genomics
- Myths, Misconceptions and Myopia: Searching for Clarity in the Debate about the Regulation of Consumer Genetics
- (2010) S. Hogarth Public Health Genomics
- DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER GENETIC TESTING: ETHICAL-LEGAL PERSPECTIVES AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
- (2010) S. Tamir Medical Law Review
- The Value of Information and the Ethics of Personal-Genomic Screening
- (2009) Peter H. Schwartz AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Direct-To-Consumer Genetics and Health Policy: A Worst-Case Scenario?
- (2009) Timothy Caulfield AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Problem Is Not Ignorance–It Is Market Failure
- (2009) Christopher F. C. Jordens et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Direct-to-Consumer Genomics and Research Ethics: Should a More Robust Informed Consent Process Be Included?
- (2009) Katherine Wasson AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Direct to consumer genetic testing: Avoiding a culture war
- (2009) James P Evans et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Impact of genetic risk information and type of disease on perceived risk, anticipated affect, and expected consequences of genetic tests.
- (2009) Linda D. Cameron et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Consumer-Driven Health Care May Not Be What Patients Need—Caveat Emptor
- (2009) Robert A. Berenson JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
- (2009) Daniel H. Farkas et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
- An agenda for personalized medicine
- (2009) Pauline C. Ng et al. NATURE
- Genetic Risk Prediction — Are We There Yet?
- (2009) Peter Kraft et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Framing genetic risk: trust and credibility markers in online direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing
- (2009) Edna F. Einsiedel et al. NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY
- Genetic Variants Associated with Complex Human Diseases Show Wide Variation across Multiple Populations
- (2009) A. Adeyemo et al. Public Health Genomics
- A Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Basis of Commercial Genomic Profiles Used to Assess Health Risks and Personalize Health Interventions
- (2008) A. Cecile J.W. Janssens et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Privacy Issues in Clinical Genomic Medicine, or Marcus Welby, M.D., Meets the $1000 Genome
- (2008) SHERI ALPERT CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
- The impact of direct-to-consumer marketing of cancer genetic testing on women according to their genetic risk
- (2008) Jan T Lowery et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- An Unwelcome Side Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing
- (2008) Amy L. McGuire et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Letting the Genome out of the Bottle — Will We Get Our Wish?
- (2008) David J. Hunter et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Health-Related Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: A Public Health Assessment and Analysis of Practices Related to Internet-Based Tests for Risk of Thrombosis
- (2008) K.A.B. Goddard et al. Public Health Genomics
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started