4.8 Editorial Material

Routine Heparin for Patients with Cancer? One Answer, More Questions

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 366, Issue 7, Pages 661-662

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe1113672

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development

Thomas Piggott, Miranda W. Langendam, Elena Parmelli, Jan Adolfsson, Elie A. Akl, David Armstrong, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Jan Brozek, Markus Follmann, Ina Kopp, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Luciana Neamtiu, Monika Nothacker, Amir Qaseem, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Zuleika Saz-Parkinson, Philip J. van der Wees, Holger J. Schunemann

Summary: The study aimed to develop an extension of the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and Tool for the integration of quality assurance and improvement (QAI) schemes with guideline development. A mixed-methods approach was used, incorporating evidence from a systematic review, an expert workshop, and a survey of experts. The result was a 40-item checklist extension, addressing steps for the integration of QAI into guideline development.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Omar Dewidar, Tamara Lotfi, Miranda W. Langendam, Elena Parmelli, Zuleika Saz Parkinson, Karla Solo, Derek K. Chu, Joseph L. Mathew, Elie A. Akl, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Reem A. Mustafa, Lorenzo Moja, Alfonso Iorio, Yuan Chi, Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Tamara Kredo, Justine Karpusheff, Alexis F. Turgeon, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Wojtek Wiercioch, Annette Gerritsen, Miloslav Klugar, Maria Ximena Rojas, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Andrea Welch, Kevin Pottie, Zachary Munn, Robby Nieuwlaat, Nathan Ford, Adrienne Stevens, Joanne Khabsa, Zil Nasir, Grigorios Leontiadis, Joerg Meerpohl, Thomas Piggott, Amir Qaseem, Micayla Matthews, Holger J. Schunemann

Summary: An evidence-based approach is the gold standard for health decision-making, but the use of the GRADE approach for strong recommendations is inappropriate in cases where the evidence is indirect. We found widespread use of GPS in COVID-19 related recommendations, but guideline developers failed to transparently report their development process. We propose improvements to the operationalization of the GRADE guidance for GPS, including a structured process and standardized reporting.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

The Pandora's Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy

Zachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone, Cindy Stern, Edoardo Aromataris, Holger J. Schuenemann, Barbara Clyne, Hanan Khalil, Reem A. Mustafa, Christina Godfrey, Andrew Booth, Andrea C. Tricco, Alan Pearson

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Decision criteria for selecting essential medicines and their connection to guidelines: an interpretive descriptive qualitative interview study

Thomas Piggott, Lorenzo Moja, Elie A. Akl, John N. Lavis, Graham Cooke, Tamara Kredo, Hans Hogerzeil, Benedikt Huttner, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Holger Schuenemann

Summary: This study aimed to identify criteria and considerations for making decisions regarding the inclusion, retention, or removal of medicines from essential medicine lists (EMLs) based on guideline recommendations. The study also explored opportunities for improving organizational processes to support evidence-based health decision-making. The findings revealed significant overlap and opportunities for alignment between guideline and EML decision processes, suggesting the need for enhanced collaboration between guideline and EML developers.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Conceptualizing the reporting of living systematic reviews

Joanne Khabsa, Stephanie Chang, Joanne E. McKenzie, James M. Barker, Isabelle Boutron, Lara A. Kahale, Matthew J. Page, Nicole Skoetz, Elie A. Akl

Summary: This article discusses the reporting issues of living systematic reviews (LSRs), including the timing, content, and format differences in the production process, specific information for reporting LSRs, and the importance of completeness and timeliness in reporting LSRs.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

Yaron Shargall, Wojtek Wiercioch, Alessandro Brunelli, Sudish Murthy, Wayne Hofstetter, Jules Lin, Hui Li, Lori-Ann Linkins, Marc Crowther, Roger Davis, Gaetano Rocco, Gian Paolo Morgano, Finn Schunemann, Giovanna Muti-Schunemann, James Douketis, Holger J. Schunemann, Virginia R. Litle

Summary: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons have jointly released evidence-based guidelines to inform clinicians and patients on VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer. The guidelines include recommendations for pharmacological and mechanical methods, but highlight the need for further research.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis

Romina Brignardello-Petersen, George Tomlinson, Ivan Florez, David M. Rind, Derek Chu, Rebecca Morgan, Reem A. Mustafa, Holger Schunemann, Gordon H. Guyatt

Summary: This article discusses considerations for addressing intransitivity when assessing the certainty of evidence from network meta-analysis (NMA) using the GRADE approach. NMA authors should consider the credibility and strength of effect modification and the distribution of effect modifiers in direct comparisons when addressing intransitivity.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Equity issues rarely addressed in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations and good practice statements: a cross-sectional study

Omar Dewidar, Mostafa Bondok, Leenah Abdelrazeq, Khadija Aliyeva, Karla Solo, Vivian Welch, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Joseph L. Mathew, Glen Hazlewood, Kevin Pottie, Lisa Hartling, Dina Sami Khalifa, Stephanie Duda, Maicon Falavigna, Joanne Khabsa, Tamara Lotfi, Jennifer Petkovic, Sarah Elliot, Yuan Chi, Roses Parker, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Alison Riddle, Andrea J. Darzi, Olivia Magwood, Ammar Saad, Gabriel Radav, Ignacio Neumann, Mark Loeb, Ludovic Reveiz, Dominik Mertz, Thomas Piggott, Alexis F. Turgeon, Holger Schunemann, Peter Tugwell

Summary: Equity issues were rarely explicitly considered in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations focused on specific disadvantaged populations. Guidance is needed to support the consideration of health equity in guideline development.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Using evidence to decision frameworks led to guidelines of better quality and more credible and transparent recommendations

Jose F. Meneses-Echavez, Julia Bidonde, Camila Montesinos-Guevara, Yasser S. Amer, Andres Felipe Loaiza-Betancur, Luis Andres Tellez Tinjaca, David Fraile Navarro, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Malgorzata M. Bala, Dawid Storman, Mateusz Swierz, Joanna Zajac, Ivan D. Florez, Holger Schunemann, Signe Flottorp, Pablo Alonso-Coellor

Summary: This study aimed to determine if the use of Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks is associated with higher quality guidelines and recommendations. Analysis of 66 guidelines showed that those using an EtD framework scored higher in quality domains. This suggests that endorsement of EtD frameworks by guideline developing organizations can improve the quality of their guidelines.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study

Ariany M. Vieira, Genevieve Szczepanik, Chiara de Waure, Andrea C. Tricco, Sandy Oliver, Jovana Stojanovic, Paula A. B. Ribeiro, Danielle Pollock, Elie A. Akl, John Lavis, Tanja Kuchenmuller, Peter Bragge, Laurenz Langer, Simon Bacon

Summary: This study aims to use the eDelphi method to obtain the opinions and suggestions of experts and stakeholders in the field of rapid systematic reviews (RRs) on methodological issues in order to guide the effective and efficient development of RRs.

BMJ OPEN (2023)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Rafael Jose Vieira, Jan Brozek, Antonio Cardoso-Fernandes, Nuno Lourenco-Silva, Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Andre Ferreira, Sara Gil-Mata, Anna Bedbrook, Ludger Klimek, Joao A. Fonseca, Torsten Zuberbier, Holger J. Schunemann, Jean Bousquet

Summary: This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness differences among different intranasal specific medications in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The study will assess the impact of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids on nasal and ocular symptoms as well as quality of life in patients with rhinitis.

BMJ OPEN (2023)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review

Vanessa Helou, Fatima Mouzahem, Adham Makarem, Hussein A. Noureldine, Rayane El-Khoury, Dana Al Oweini, Razan Halak, Layal Hneiny, Joanne Khabsa, Elie A. Akl

Summary: This study aims to synthesize the available evidence on the reporting of conflicts of interest (COI) by individuals posting health messages on social media, and on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. The results show that the frequency of reporting of conflicts of interest varied between 0% and 60%, but mostly remained low. Additionally, a significant proportion (ranging between 15% and 80%) of healthcare professionals using social media have financial relationships with industry. However, there is a lack of reporting on COI and undisclosed COI is common.

BMJ OPEN (2023)

Review Behavioral Sciences

Prevalence of co-occurring conditions in children and adults with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Martina Micai, Laura Maria Fatta, Letizia Gila, Angela Caruso, Tommaso Salvitti, Francesca Fulceri, Antonio Ciaramella, Roberto D'Amico, Cinzia Del Giovane, Marco Bertelli, Giovanna Romano, Holger Jens Schunemann, Maria Luisa Scattoni

Summary: This systematic review estimated the prevalence of co-occurring conditions (CCs) in individuals with autism. The study found developmental coordination disorder, sleep-wake problem, gastrointestinal problem, ADHD, anxiety disorder, overweight/obesity, feeding and eating disorder, elimination disorder, disruptive behavior, and somatic symptoms and related disorder to be the most frequent CCs. The prevalence varied depending on age group and study design. Understanding specific CCs linked to autism can aid professionals in conducting investigations and interventions for better outcomes.

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS (2023)

Article Pediatrics

Plain Language vs Standard Format for Youth Understanding of COVID-19 Recommendations A Randomized Clinical Trial

Lisa Stallwood, Adrian Sammy, Matthew Prebeg, Jacqueline Relihan, Ami Baba, Rana Charide, Shahab Sayfi, Sarah A. Elliott, Lisa Hartling, Matthew Munan, Dawn P. Richards, Joseph L. Mathew, Tamara Kredo, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Ashley Motilall, Shannon D. Scott, Miloslav Klugar, Tamara Lotfi, Adrienne L. Stevens, Kevin Pottie, Holger J. Schunemann, Nancy J. Butcher, Martin Offringa

Summary: In this randomized clinical trial, a digital plain language recommendation (PLR) was compared with the standard language version (SLV) of a health recommendation. The results showed no significant difference in understanding scores between the PLR and SLV groups. However, youths ranked the PLR higher in terms of accessibility, usability, and satisfaction, suggesting that it may be preferred for communicating health recommendations to youths. Interviews provided suggestions for further improving the PLR format.

JAMA PEDIATRICS (2023)

No Data Available