Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 20, Pages 2781-2793
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2015-05-19
DOI
10.1002/sim.6525
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study
- (2014) Akira Onishi et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
- (2014) M. Kicinski BMJ Open
- Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
- (2014) Kerry Dwan et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Which placebo to cure depression? A thought-provoking network meta-analysis
- (2013) Florian Naudet et al. BMC Medicine
- A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. PLoS One
- Publication Bias in Recent Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Michal Kicinski PLoS One
- Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2013) A. Dechartres et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
- (2013) Carolina Riveros et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Bias in Associations of Emerging Biomarkers With Cardiovascular Disease
- (2013) Ioanna Tzoulaki et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P
- (2012) Philip Wilson et al. BMC Medicine
- Empirical Evaluation of Very Large Treatment Effects of Medical Interventions
- (2012) Tiago V. Pereira et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Evaluation of Excess Statistical Significance in Meta-analyses of 98 Biomarker Associations with Cancer Risk
- (2012) Konstantinos K. Tsilidis et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity
- (2012) Santiago G. Moreno et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities
- (2011) John P. A. Ioannidis ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
- Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta analysis
- (2011) Kaspar Rufibach BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis
- (2010) G. Rucker et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Publication of Clinical Trials Supporting Successful New Drug Applications: A Literature Analysis
- (2008) Kirby Lee et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
- (2008) Kristin Rising et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes
- (2007) Gerta Rücker et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More