4.6 Article

MICROSURGICAL AND ENDOSCOPIC ANATOMY OF THE SUPRATENTORIAL ARACHNOIDAL MEMBRANES AND CISTERNS

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 644-664

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000351774.81674.32

Keywords

Cerebral arteries; Cerebrospinal fluid; Cranial base; Meninges; Microsurgical anatomy; Skull base; Subarachnoid space; Supratentorial cisterns

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: A limitation of previous studies of the arachnoid cisterns and membranes is that the act of opening the sylvian and interhemispheric fissures and basal arachnoid often led to destruction of the cisternal compartments and their membranous walls. The goal of this study was to overcome this limitation by combining the surgical microscope and endoscope for the examination of the cisternal compartments and their membranous walls. METHODS: The supratentorial cisterns were examined in 22 cadaveric brains using both the operating microscope and the endoscope. RESULTS: There are 2 types of arachnoid membranes: outer and inner. The outer arachnoidal membrane surrounds the whole brain, and the inner membranes divide the subarachnoid space into cisterns. Twelve inner arachnoid membranes were identified in the supratentorial area: diencephalic, mesencephalic, medial carotid, intracarotid, intracrural, olfactory, medial and lateral lamina terminalis, and proximal, medial, intermediate, and lateral sylvian membranes. These membranes partially or completely separate the subarachnoid space into 9 supratentorial cisterns: sylvian, carotid, chiasmatic, lamina terminalis, pericallosal, crural, ambient, oculomotor, and interpeduncular. There is a confluent area between the carotid, interpeduncular, and crural cisterns, which frequently has no membrane separating these cisterns. CONCLUSION: Twelve inner arachnoid membranes and 9 cisterns were identified in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available