4.3 Article

Antihistamine effects on prefrontal cortex activity during working memory process in preschool children: A near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 80-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.01.010

Keywords

Antihistamine; Epinastine; Histamine; Ketotifen; Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS); Preschool children; Working memory

Categories

Funding

  1. Japanese Public Health Research Foundation (JPHRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histamine H-1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are widely used for the treatment of allergic disorders in young children. This study examined the effects of antihistamine on prefrontal cortex activity in preschool children using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), an emerging brain-imaging method suitable for psychological experiments, especially in young children. We examined the changes of oxygenated hemoglobin concentration in the prefrontal cortex while children performed a spatial working memory task, 3 h after taking a first-generation antihistamine (ketotifen), second-generation antihistamine (epinastine), or placebo. Fifteen healthy preschool children (mean age, 5.5 years) participated. Ketotifen significantly impaired behavioral performance and cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal cortex in the working memory task, compared with epinastine and placebo. There were no sedative effects on neural response or behavioral performance after epinastine administration. This paper demonstrates for the first time differential sedation effects of first- and second-generation antihistamines on brain hemodynamic response in young children. Also discussed is the utility of the NIRS technique in neuropsychopharmacological studies of children. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available