4.4 Article

Concurrent visual and tactile steady-state evoked potentials index allocation of inter-modal attention: A frequency-tagging study

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 556, Issue -, Pages 113-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.09.068

Keywords

Vision; Touch; Inter-modal attention; Cross-modal; Steady-state evoked potentials; EEG

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GRK-1182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated effects of inter-modal attention on concurrent visual and tactile stimulus processing by means of stimulus-driven oscillatory brain responses, so-called steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs). To this end, we frequency-tagged a visual (7.5 Hz) and a tactile stimulus (20 Hz) and participants were cued, on a trial-by-trial basis, to attend to either vision or touch to perform a detection task in the cued modality. SSEPs driven by the stimulation comprised stimulus frequency-following (i.e. fundamental frequency) as well as frequency-doubling (i.e. second harmonic) responses. We observed that inter-modal attention to vision increased amplitude and phase synchrony of the fundamental frequency component of the visual SSEP while the second harmonic component showed an increase in phase synchrony, only. In contrast, inter-modal attention to touch increased SSEP amplitude of the second harmonic but not of the fundamental frequency, while leaving phase synchrony unaffected in both responses. Our results show that inter-modal attention generally influences concurrent stimulus processing in vision and touch, thus, extending earlier audio-visual findings to a visuo-tactile stimulus situation. The pattern of results, however, suggests differences in the neural implementation of inter-modal attentional influences on visual vs. tactile stimulus processing. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available