4.4 Article

N-acetyl cysteine restores brain glutathione loss in combined 2-cyclohexene-1-one and D-amphetamine-treated rats: Relevance to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 499, Issue 3, Pages 149-153

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.027

Keywords

Glutathione; Schizophrenia; Bipolar disorder; Acetyl cysteine; 2-Cyclohexene-1-one (CHX); Amphetamine

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Woods Family Foundation
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council
  5. Bristol Myers Squibb
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Organon
  9. Novartis
  10. Mayne Pharma
  11. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress and reduced brain levels of glutathione have been implicated in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a precursor of glutathione and has additional effects on glutamate neurotransmission, neurogenesis and inflammation. While NAC treatment has shown benefits in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the mechanisms of action are largely unknown. Similarly, the interaction between oxidative stress and altered dopaminergic activities in psychiatric illness is not yet characterized. This study investigated the capacity of NAC in restoring brain glutathione depletion in rats that received 2-cyclohexene-1-one (CHX, 75 mg/kg), D-amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) or both. CHX, but not amphetamine, induced significant depletion of glutathione levels in the striatum and frontal cortex. Glutathione depletion was reversed by NAC (1000 mg/kg) in saline-treated and amphetamine-treated (frontal cortex only) rats. While NAC was shown to be beneficial in this model, the lack of additional glutathione depletion by amphetamine in combination with CHX does not support a summative interaction between oxidative stress and altered dopamine transmission. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available