4.4 Article

Noradrenaline-induced spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in mouse basolateral nucleus of amygdala pyramidal neurons: Comparison with dopamine-induced currents

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 480, Issue 3, Pages 167-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.001

Keywords

Noradrenaline; Dopamine; GABA; Spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic current; Amygdala; Mouse

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) receives both noradrenergic and dopaminergic projections. These projections are thought to be important for modulation of amygdala neural circuits. In BLA pyramidal neurons, noradrenaline (NA) is known to facilitate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) through excitation of interneurons. Dopamine (DA) also is known to facilitate GABAergic sIPSCs in pyramidal neurons of the amygdala region including the BLA. It is unclear which neurotransmitter, NA or DA, is predominant in facilitating sIPSC in the BLA. Whether NA and DA facilitate sIPSC in different or the same pyramidal neurons also remains unknown. Herein, we employed the patch clamp recording technique on BLA pyramidal neurons in mouse brain slices, and compared the facilitating actions of NA and DA on sIPSCs. First NA and then DA, or first DA and then NA, were applied to a slice. NA enhanced sIPSC frequency in the majority (80-90%) of pyramidal neurons tested, whereas DA enhanced sIPSC frequency in relatively few neurons (approximately 30%). Neurons responding to NA alone and DA alone accounted, respectively, for 54.3% and 2.9% of the pyramidal neurons tested (11.4% of neurons responded to neither NA nor DA). Pyramidal neurons in which NA and DA both facilitated sIPSCs accounted for 31.4% of neurons tested. These results suggest that NA facilitates GABAergic sIPSCs in a larger proportion of mouse BLA pyramidal neurons than DA. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available