4.5 Article

Marked selective impairment in autism on an index of magnocellular function

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 592-600

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.005

Keywords

Autism; Asperger syndrome; Magnocellular; Parvocellular; Vision; Contrast sensitivity

Funding

  1. Pinsent-Darwin studentship
  2. MRC (UK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atypical high-level vision in autism is sometimes attributed to a core deficit in the function of lateral geniculate nucleus magnocells or their retinal drives. While some physiological measures provide indirect, suggestive evidence for such a deficit, support from behavioural measures is lacking and contradictory. We assessed luminance contrast increment thresholds on pulsed- and steady- pedestals in 17 children with autism spectrum conditions (ASC) compared to 17 typically developing children; these two conditions correspond to widely-used indices of magnocellular and parvocellular function. As a group, children with ASC had strikingly elevated thresholds on the steady pedestal-paradigm, yet performed similarly to controls on the pulsed pedestal paradigm, a finding that would typically be interpreted to reflect impaired magnocellular function. The effect size of the impairment was large and a substantial minority (41.2%) of the ASC group showed significantly impaired performance on an individual basis. This finding is consistent with a selective magnocellular deficit. It directly contradicts previous claims that such deficits are confined to 'complex' visual stimuli and likely does not reflect atypical attention, adaptation or high-level vision. The pattern of results is not clearly predicted by notions of imbalance of excitation versus inhibition, atypical lateral connectivity or enhanced perceptual function that account for a range of other findings associated with perception in autism. It may be amenable to explanation in terms of decreased endogenous neural noise, a novel alternative we outline here. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available