4.2 Article

Differential roles of calcitonin family peptides in the dendrite formation and spinogenesis of the cerebral cortex in vitro

Journal

NEUROPEPTIDES
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 263-272

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.npep.2011.04.001

Keywords

CGRP; Amylin; Neuropeptide; Rat; Culture; Spine formation

Funding

  1. Long-range Research Initiative (LRI) by Japan Chemical Industry Association (JCIA)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22590167] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined roles of calcitonin family peptides in the initial stages of dendrite formation and the maturation of dendritic spines in the rat cerebral cortex in vitro. Embryonic day 18 cortical neurons were dissociated and cultured for 2-3 days in the presence of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), calcitonin, amylin or adrenomedullin. The treatment of cortical neurons with CGRP promoted the formation of primary dendrites of non-GABAergic neurons. In contrast, the treatment with amylin and adrenomedullin for 3 days inhibited the dendritic elongation of non-GABAergic neurons. Calcitonin had no effect on the initial dendrite formation. Next, we examined roles of the peptides in the spine formation. Embryonic day 16 cortical neurons were cultured for 14 days and then treated acutely with CGRP, amylin or adrenomedullin for 24 h. The density of filopodia, puncta/stubby spines and spines were increased by the CGRP treatment, whereas decreased by amylin. Therefore, CGRP and amylin showed opposite effects on the formation of dendritic filopodia, puncta and spines. Adrenomedullin had no effects on the spine formation. In conclusion, the present study showed that calcitonin family peptides have differential effects both in the dendrite formation during the initial stages and the spine formation of cortical neurons in vitro. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available