4.3 Article

Paraoxonase 1 Polymorphisms Are Not Related with the Risk for Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

NEUROMOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 217-223

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12017-009-8095-9

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Genetics; Genetic polymorphisms; Paraoxonase 1; Oxidative stress; Risk factors

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain [05/1056, 06/1252, RD07/0064/0016]
  2. FUNDESALUD, Merida, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been suggested a possible role of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in the inflammatory processes and in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Human serum paraoxonase 1 is a polymorphic enzyme encoded by the gene PON1, located in chromosome 7q21.3, that plays a major role in the metabolism of organophosporus compounds, and in the protection against oxidative stress. Paraoxonase-1 activity has been found decreased in the plasma of multiple sclerosis patients. An association between PON1 polymorphism and the risk of multiple sclerosis has been described in Italians. To investigate the possible association between the PON1 genotype and allelic variants of the polymorphisms L55M and Q192R and the risk for multiple sclerosis in the Spanish Caucasian population; we studied the frequency of the PON1 genotypes and allelic variants in 228 patients with multiple sclerosis and 220 healthy controls using a PCR-RLFP method. The frequencies of the PON1 genotypes and allelic variants did not differ significantly between patients and controls, and were unrelated with gender, age of onset, and course of the disease. The OR (95% confidence intervals) for the variant alleles PON1-55L and PON1-192R were 0.96 (0.73-1.26) and 1.01 (0.76-1.35), respectively. The results of the present study suggest that PON1 polymorphism is not related with the risk for multiple sclerosis in our population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available