4.3 Article

Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Headache: 60 Cases and Long-Term Follow-Up

Journal

NEUROMODULATION
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 54-59

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12130

Keywords

chronic pain; headache; migraine; neuromodulation; occipital nerve stimulation; outcome measure; peripheral nerve field stimulation

Funding

  1. MetroSpinal Clinic, Caulfield South, Victoria, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) for the treatment of chronic headache conditions. Materials and MethodsFor more than a four-year period, 83 patients underwent a trial of a PNFS system targeting the nerve regions including occipital and supraorbital and infraorbital nerves, which best corresponded with their area of head pain. Sixty patients reported a successful trial and underwent a subsequent implant of the PNFS system. Questionnaires, along with patients' charts, were used to assess outcomes as follows: pain (11-point numerical pain rating scale), analgesic use, depression (Zung Depression Scale), disability (Neck Disability Index), patient satisfaction, and surgical complications. Patients were followed up for an average of 12.9 9.4 months (range 3-42 months). ResultsAn average pain reduction of 4.8 +/- 2.3 pain scale points was observed (preimplant 7.4 +/- 1.6; follow-up 2.6 +/- 2.1 [p 0.001]). Of the 60 patients implanted, 41 reported >50% pain relief. Medication use was reduced in 83% of patients who were previously taking analgesics or prophylactic medications. Similarly, reductions in degree of disability and depression also were observed. Of the 60 cases, ten surgical revisions were required; however, no long-term complications were reported. ConclusionsPNFS for chronic headache is an evolving therapy. This study demonstrates that this reversible and effective treatment can be a promising pain relief strategy for this often intractable condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available