4.3 Article

F-Wave Suppression Induced by Suprathreshold High-Frequency Repetitive Trascranial Magnetic Stimulation in Poststroke Patients with Increased Spasticity

Journal

NEUROMODULATION
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 206-211

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00520.x

Keywords

F-wave; poststroke; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); spinal cord excitability

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [C-18591614]
  2. MEXT
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592176, 18591614] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective High-intensity and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex was carried out in poststroke patients with increased spasticity, and the changes in F-wave parameters in comparison with M-wave parameters induced by rTMS were examined. Methods Ten-hertz rTMS pulses were delivered to the primary motor cortex of the lesion side at 110% intensity of the resting motor threshold, and F-waves were obtained from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. F-waves were recorded before (pre-stim) and immediately after the end of rTMS (post-stim) in poststroke patients. Results F-wave persistence and F/M Amp.Ratio increased significantly in patients with lesions in upper motor tract as compared with healthy subjects (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.00023 and p = 0.0073, respectively). After the rTMS application, both F-wave persistence and F/M Amp.Ratio decreased significantly (paired t-test, p = 0.0095 and p = 0.037, respectively). However, the F-wave amplitude did not show a statistically significant variance in poststroke patients. Conclusions High-frequency suprathreshold rTMS may suppress the F-waves by enhancing the inhibitory effect on spinal excitability through the corticospinal tract, and F-wave persistence and F/M Amp.Ratio can be used to determine the effect of rTMS on patients with increased spasticity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available