4.3 Article

Assessment of Patient Preference for Constant Voltage and Constant Current Spinal Cord Stimulation

Journal

NEUROMODULATION
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 210-217

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00284.x

Keywords

Back pain; current; paresthesia; spinal cord stimulation; voltage

Funding

  1. Medtronic, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation devices control energy by generating either constant voltage (CV) pulses or constant current (CC) pulses. This study aimed to investigate: 1) whether patients feel differences between CV and CC stimulation; 2) if patients prefer CV or CC stimulation. Methods: Fourteen patients blinded to the type of pulse generation received 20 randomized pairs of 15-sec pulse trains (CC-CV, CV-CC, CV-CV, or CC-CC). Patients identified whether the pairs were the same or different, and if they preferred the first or second train. Results: There was no difference in charge-per-pulse input between CV and CC modes. Patients performed at chance level in identifying identical pairs (55.7 +/- 24.1% correct, 10 trials), and slightly better in identifying different pairs (67.1 +/- 25.2% correct, 10 trials). No patients correctly identified all pairs. Patients were categorized based on their performance in this task. Only three patients fell into a category where preference could be established with some confidence with respect to the group averages. Two of these patients preferred CV, while one patient preferred CC. Conclusion: The lack of patient ability to discriminate in this preliminary investigation suggests that patient preference for a stimulation type should not be the key determining factor in choosing a spinal cord stimulation system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available