4.7 Article

Allopregnanolone levels and seizure frequency in progesterone-treated women with epilepsy

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 345-348

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000623

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NIH R01 NS39466]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether allopregnanolone (AP) may mediate seizure reduction in progesterone-treated women with epilepsy. Methods: The NIH Progesterone Trial compared the efficacy of adjunctive cyclic natural progesterone therapy vs placebo treatment of intractable seizures in 294 subjects, randomized 2:1 to progesterone or placebo, stratified by catamenial vs noncatamenial designation. Treatments were compared on proportions of 50% responders, and changes in seizure frequency from 3 baseline to 3 treatment cycles. Serum AP levels were measured by radioimmunoassay from 155 women with intractable focal-onset seizures who had baseline and treatment-phase midluteal serum samples drawn each cycle for hormone measurements. Results: There was no significant correlation between percentage changes in AP levels and seizure frequencies from baseline to treatment for either the catamenial or noncatamenial stratum. There was a significant correlation for the subset of subjects who showed a significantly greater responder rate in the post hoc analysis of the trial, i.e., subjects who had a 3-fold or greater increase in average daily seizure frequency perimenstrually compared with the midfollicular and midluteal phases (C1 >= 3: r = -0.442, p = 0.013, and specifically for C1 >= 3 progesterone-treated subjects [r = -0.452, p = 0.035], but not other groups [C1 >= 3 placebo: r = -0.367; C1 <3 progesterone: r = 0.099; C1 <3 placebo: r = 0.131; p = not significant]). Conclusions: The findings support AP as a mediator of seizure reduction in progesterone-treated women who have a substantial level of perimenstrually exacerbated seizures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available