4.7 Article

Long-term risk of developing epilepsy after febrile seizures A prospective cohort study

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 15, Pages 1166-1170

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824f807a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brain Research Trust
  2. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Dr. Marvin Weil Epilepsy Research Fund
  4. Epilepsy Society
  5. Janssen, Eisai Inc.
  6. UCB
  7. MRC
  8. Janssen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We report the prospective follow-up of a cohort of people from the onset of febrile seizures for a median of 24 years to estimate the long-term risk of developing epilepsy. Methods: The National General Practice Study of Epilepsy is a large prospective community study of 1,195 people with a first suspected seizure followed from the 1980s, of whom 220 (18%) had febrile seizures. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for subsequent epilepsy were calculated in 5-year age bands. Results: Follow-up information was obtained for 181 (83%) people with a mean follow-up for the whole cohort of 21.6 (SD 6.0) years. Of these, 175 (97%) were seizure-free in the preceding 5 years, whereas 171 (94%) were seizure-free and off antiepileptic drugs. Six percent developed epilepsy, but the risk of developing epilepsy in the cohort over the whole follow-up period was almost 10 times that of the general population (SIR 9.7, 95% CI 5.7-16.4). The SIR was significantly elevated in the 0- to 14-year age groups but not in the 15- to 19-year age group (SIR 4.5, 95% CI 0.6-32.1). Conclusion: The risk of developing epilepsy in people who had febrile seizures seems to decrease with time. Further long- term studies are needed to confirm this. Neurology (R) 2012;78:1166-1170

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available