4.7 Article

Evaluation of safety monitoring guidelines based on MRI lesion activity in multiple sclerosis

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 24, Pages 2089-2096

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823d762d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  4. MS Society of Canada
  5. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  6. Bayer Schering Pharma
  7. Solstice Neurosciences
  8. Biogen Idec
  9. Merck Serono/Pfizer Inc
  10. Opexa Therapeutics
  11. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  12. Consortium of MS Centers
  13. NIH (NICHHD)
  14. NIH (NIDDK)
  15. NIH (NINDS)
  16. NIH (NHLBI)
  17. NIH (NIAIDS)
  18. NMSS
  19. Klein-Buendel Incorporated
  20. CIHR
  21. Lotte Hecht Foundation
  22. Vancouver Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We evaluate variants of a commonly used data safety monitoring guideline in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) that flags patients who, at a follow-up visit, have 5 or more contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) above their baseline count. Methods: We apply the guideline to a relapsing cohort and a secondary progressive cohort. We assess the number of patients that meet the guideline and describe the characteristics of these patients; we also examine the value of the guideline in predicting relapse occurrence in the 28 days following that MRI. These analyses were repeated for thresholds varying from 1 to 10 CELs above baseline. Results: Between 4% and 6% of patients met the threshold of 5 in both cohorts; patients with higher baseline counts and higher T2 lesion burden were more apt to meet the threshold. After adjustment for other covariates, the odds ratio (OR) of relapse associated with meeting the threshold is significant (p < 0.05) or near significant (0.05 <= p < 0.10) for thresholds between 5 and 8 for the relapsing cohort, but not for the secondary progressive cohort. Across thresholds, the adjusted OR is consistently greater than 1, and there is an increasing trend as the threshold increases from 1 to 7. Conclusions: A guideline based on crossing a threshold CEL count above baseline may be valuable in monitoring patient safety. Further study should be conducted using different datasets to assess the generalizability of these results. Neurology (R) 2011; 77: 2089-2096

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available