4.7 Article

Perceptual reasoning predicts handwriting impairments in adolescents with autism

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 20, Pages 1825-1829

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd633d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [NINDS R01 NS047781-04, NINDS R01 NS048527, NIMH 5 R01 MH078160-03, NICHD P50 HD052121-03, NICHD/NCMRR R01 HD040289, NICHD/NCMRR R01 HD048741, NINDS R21 NS061189, NICHD/NCMRR R21 HD060169, R01 NS048527]
  2. Autism Speaks
  3. Johns Hopkins Brain Sciences Institute
  4. Basic Clinical Science awards

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We have previously shown that children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have specific handwriting deficits consisting of poor form, and that these deficits are predicted by their motor abilities. It is not known whether the same handwriting impairments persist into adolescence and whether they remain linked to motor deficits. Methods: A case-control study of handwriting samples from adolescents with and without ASD was performed using the Minnesota Handwriting Assessment. Samples were scored on an individual letter basis in 5 categories: legibility, form, alignment, size, and spacing. Subjects were also administered an intelligence test and the Physical and Neurological Examination for Subtle (Motor) Signs (PANESS). Results: We found that adolescents with ASD, like children, show overall worse performance on a handwriting task than do age-and intelligence-matched controls. Also comparable to children, adolescents with ASD showed motor impairments relative to controls. However, adolescents with ASD differ from children in that Perceptual Reasoning Indices were significantly predictive of handwriting performance whereas measures of motor skills were not. Conclusions: Like children with ASD, adolescents with ASD have poor handwriting quality relative to controls. Despite still demonstrating motor impairments, in adolescents perceptual reasoning is the main predictor of handwriting performance, perhaps reflecting subjects' varied abilities to learn strategies to compensate for their motor impairments. Neurology (R) 2010;75:1825-1829

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available