4.0 Article

Low Peripheral Lymphocyte Count Before Focal Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant Temozolomide Predicts Severe Lymphopenia During Malignant Glioma Treatment

Journal

NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 638-643

Publisher

JAPAN NEUROSURGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.50.638

Keywords

lymphocytopenia; temozolomide; glioblastoma; anaplastic astrocytoma; infection

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan [20390379]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20390379] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malignant glioma patients treated with the golden standard therapy, focal radiotherapy plus concomitant daily temozolomide (radiotherapy/TMZ), often suffer severe lymphopenia. The frequency of severe lymphopenia and its predictors were analyzed by assessing adverse effects including decrease in white blood cell counts, lymphocyte counts, and neutrocyte counts according to the Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0 (CTC) in 28 consecutive patients with pathologically verified malignant gliomas treated with radiotherapy/TMZ. Eighty-two percent of the patients suffered one or more adverse effects; lymphopenia (68%) was the most frequent adverse effect, with 32% of patients suffering CTC grade 4 lymphopenia. CTC grade 4 lymphopenia was associated with the incidence of other CTC grade 3 or 4 adverse effects and discontinuance of TMZ. Minimal lymphocyte counts during radiotherapy/TMZ and lymphocyte counts before radiotherapy/TMZ showed close linear correlation by linear regression analysis (p < 0.0001, R(2) = 0.569), and the most important predictor for CTC grade 4 lymphopenia was lymphocyte count before radiotherapy/TMZ less than 1200/mu l by multivariate analysis (p < 0.0321, Exp = 13.2). Lymphocyte counts before radiotherapy/TMZ of less than 1200/mu l predict severe lymphopenia during radiotherapy/TMZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available